Ben-Naim’s 2012 interpretation of “entropy”, the bull’s-eye view of which he equates to what he calls “Shannon’s measure of information” (SMI) or Shannon entropy, surrounding by other historical interpretations of entropy (see also: misinterpretations), namely: disorder, freedom (or degrees of freedom), spreading (or energy spreading/energy dispersal), information, and chaos. [3] |
“Your proposal about Shannon information … S — is nothing but another word that begins with S and refers to human excrement. You should be abjectly ashamed of yourself. Not only are your methods and your behavior nauseating but your ability in uniting information theory and statistical mechanics is erased by your ignorance in dismissing the needs of ordinary students, specifically beginning chemistry students to whom entropy and thermodynamics are enormous conceptual obstacles. Abandonment of the terribly flawed manuscript that you sent to … and collaboration with him on melding your expertise in complex probability with our proved success in conceptual perceptions could result in a synthesis that would change education in entropy for this and succeeding generations. If this does not occur, I will literally fight to my death to show the world the fallacy of believing that your views are anything but those of a deceptive, half-truth promoting, dishonest person as you have shown yourself to me.”— Frank Lambert (2009), review of Ben-Naim’s Entropy Demystified