In terminology, Atheist’s Bible is a term, arisen in the 18th century, and thereafter, referring to a book that supplants religious belief for naturalism, materialism, physicalism, chemicalism, physicochemicalism, physicochemical-materialism reductionist based view of nature, via an explicit godless mode of logic; physicochemical atheism propounded, in short.
Rankings
The following is a work-in-progress ranking of the known "historical" so-called atheist's bibles, each as summarized further below, chronologically:
# | Book | Date | Notes | |
----------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | |||
1. | (1723-1789) | The System of Nature: Laws of Moral and Physical World | 1770 | Presents an anti-chance based, matter-and-motion basis of all things; credited with making both Goethe and Percy Shelley, the two main human elective affinity theorists, who each read this work in college, atheists. |
2. | (1824-1899) | Force and Matter: Principles of the Natural Order of the Universe, with a System of Morality Based Thereon | 1855 | |
3. | (99-55BC) | On the Nature of Things | 55BC | Presents the gist synopsis of Epicureanism. |
4. | (1749-1832) | Elective Affinities | 1809 | |
5. | (1737-1809) | The Age of Reason | 1794 | |
6. | (1749-1822) | Moral State of Nature | 1789 | Note: the “Advertisement” (Ѻ), to his Moral State of Nations, which he indirectly refers to as the “Bible of Nature”, states that he presents a scheme of “pantheism”, a golden mean between “deluded superstition [theism], dogmatic deism, and chaotic atheism”. |
“In 1453, Gutenberg’s press turned out the first printed book, a Bible. By 1473, presses had published On the Nature of Things. Only twenty years had elapsed between the first mechanically printed bible and the first mechanically printed Lucretius!”— Jennifer Hecht (2004), Doubt: a History (pg. 271)
“The modern myth that scientists will save mankind can be traced back to Bacon's scientific Utopia, New Atlantis. In his critique of Hobbes, Professor Mazzeo concentrates on the psychological aspects of Hobbesian thought rather than the political. Hobbes anticipated Freud in several insights, for example his view of the atemporality of unconscious processes and his conviction that religion was based on fear. Leviathan, however, is not so much an atheist's bible, as has sometimes been charged.”— Author (1967), “Article” (Ѻ), The Month
French materialism philosopher Baron d’Holbach’s 1770 The System of Nature, the most-cited representation of an "Atheist’s Bible"; other so-labeled “Atheist Bibles include: Thomas Paine’s The Age of Reason (1794), Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan (1651), Winwood Reade’s The Martyrdom of Man (1872), and Bertrand Russell’s Why I’m Not a Christian (1927). |
“Dr. Beard, in his lecture (sermon), quoted at some length d’Holbach’s System of Nature, which he called the Atheist’s Bible. D’Holbach’s conclusion was that there was no god.”— George Holyoake (1861), “Manchester Lectures on Secularism, by the Reverend Dr. Beard”, The Reasoner (pg. 169), Mar 17
“Many of his manuscripts were published anonymously after being smuggled to Holland for publication. More officially, he wrote hundreds of articles for the Encycloptdie, principally on earth sciences such as geology, chemistry, and mineralogy; and, in 1770, he published his Systeme de la nature (System of Nature), his comprehensive defense of atheistic materialism sometimes called the "atheist's bible". This work pulled no punches. It depicted humanity as entirely a product of nonintelligent natural forces acting under necessary laws. The "soul" is an illusion. "Mind" is purely organic. Matter is inherently endowed with energy enough to account for all observed events. The book was immediately suppressed, of course, but nonetheless attracted a wide readership.”
— Frederick Ferre (1996), Being and Value: Constructive Postmodern Medaphysics (pg. 186)
“Holbach's book Le Système de la nature became known as the Atheist's Bible.”— Jonathan Miller (2004), “Atheism: a Rough History of Disbelief” (Ѻ), BBC special
“During a circumstantial discussion of this spread through political associations such as the London Corresponding Society and other groups whose shifting addresses in both the East and West Ends are closely tracked, Paine's Age of Reason is given pride of place as the ‘New Holy Bible’ of the infidels (p. 5). It was, however, accompanied or preceded by such other works as the ‘heavy artillery of Voltaire, Godwin, &c.’, Meslier's Le Bon Sens, the works of Peter Annet (until stopped by prosecution) (pp. 7-8), and above all, Mirabaud's [i.e. d’Holbach's] System of Nature, and Volney's Ruins of Empires: the latter, in point of style, is looked upon as the Hervey of the Deists; the former, as the Newton of the Atheists: and, as the System of Nature was translated by a person confined in Newgate as a patriot, and published in weekly numbers, its sale was pushed' (p. 6).”— Martin Priestman (2000), on quotes from William Reid’s The Rise and Dissolution of the Infidel Societies (1800), in: Romantic Atheism: Poetry and Freethought, 1780-1830 (pg. 39)
“Although denounced as the 'Atheist's Bible', Paine's work is actually an exposition of a radical kind of deism and makes an attempt at critical biblical scholarship that anticipates modern efforts. How many American leaders of today would have the courage to enlighten the public as to their true feelings regarding religion, but instead follow timidly along like sheep in fear of being ostracized?.”— Christopher Reyes (2010), In His Name (pg. 230)
The following are two citations, in literature, to working atheist bibles, firstly Gunter Grass' 1959 Goethe-Rasputin Bible, where god is replaced with free energy, second Ernesto Sabato's 1971 Ostwald Bible, where god is replaced with energy (Wilhelm Ostwald, to note, was also the first atheist preacher of sorts, via is Monistic Sunday Sermons). |
“Buchner's Force and Matter also became the Bible of a new movement, ‘free thinking’, otherwise known as atheism.”— Howard Bloom (2012), The God Problem (pg. #)
Libb Thims 2016 draft-stage Smart Atheism: for Kids, originally entitled as "Atheist's Children's Bible". |
“He was a practical electrician fond of whiskey, a heavy, red-haired brute with irregular teeth. He doubted the existence of a deity but accepted Carnot’s cycle, and he had read Shakespeare and found him weak in chemistry.”— Herbert Wells (1906), "Lord of the Dynamos" (Ѻ); in: The Door in the Wall, and Other Stories [1]
“Thus Spake Zarathustra has been called the ‘atheist’s bible’, for so Nietzsche intended it.”— Wiley Richard (1990), The Bible and Christian Traditions: Keys to Understanding the Allegorical Subplot of Nietzsche's Zarathustra (pg. 35)