Left: an example of a social boundary demarcated by a boundary line sign on a barbed wired fence, which visually exemplifies the boundary problem difficulties in attempts to quantify societal "boundaries" in thermodynamic terms, in terms of work, energy, and heat crossings or closedness or openness aspects. Right: a van't Hoff equilibrium box (1886), build and by Danish physical chemist Jacobus van't Hoff, used to calculate the work done when certain chemical species cross a semi-permeable membrane; such as could be deduced for when say a Mexican species of person crosses illegally (or legally) into the American system across the semi-permeable boundary of the US border, the work cost of which typically amounts to several thousands of dollars per smuggle. |
“Schrodinger’s discussion of thermodynamics is vague and superficial to an extent that should not be tolerated even in a popular lecture. In the discussion of thermodynamic quantities it is important to define the system. When he is writing about a change in entropy of the system, Schrodinger never even defines the system. Sometimes he seems to consider that the system is a living organism with no interaction whatever with the environment; and sometimes it is a living organism in thermal equilibrium with the environment; and sometimes it is the living organism plus the environment, that is the universe as a whole.”
“It is quite unclear where the boundary should be drawn for discussions of the quantity of energy, or if there is any relevant boundary.”
“Boundaries pose a problem for sociology.”— Richard Adams (1988), The Eight Day (pg. 143)