A 2013 chemical analogy type sketch by Ben Biddle in a blog entitled “Innovation is like a Chemical Reaction”, the coffee napkin sketch representative of what he calls a “powerful analogy for innovation”, which he describes as follows: “catalysts are problems in need of a solution. Adding heat means tapping into the passion of the individuals working on the problem. Increasing the surface area amounts to opening up your organization and exposing it to more ideas. Motion comes from changing the context – just mentally re-framing things in a new way or even physically moving your location, as you might do with an offsite. When they all come together, there’s a transformative reaction.” |
See main: Social bondAmerican sociologist David Hachen comments on the 1859 work of Durkheim who distinguished between two types of “bonds” or “solidarity”, in his terminology: mechanical solidarity, or social bonds among persons based on shared moral sentiments, and organic solidarity, or social bonds based on a complex division of labor that connects members of industrialized societies. Hatchen, however, not being a chemist by training, makes the following dismissive blunder, in his claim that social bonds are chemical bonds: [2]
“The bonds that connect people together are not chemical bonds, although we sometimes use a chemical analogy, like when we say that there is real chemistry between two lovers. Rather, the bonds among people are social connections formed through social relationships, group affiliations, networks, and organizational memberships. Connections forge bonds, and it is these bonds that hold society together. Form his theoretical framework, much of what goes on in our social worlds concerns bonding, and sociologists who use this framework view the need to form bonds as the central driving force in society.”