Some basic "chemical reactions" (top three) as compared to a "human chemical reaction" (bottom reaction) mechanism, showing the human reproduction reaction, all of which being governed by one and the same combined law of chemical thermodynamics, showing that all four are one and the same process, of "reactants" transforming to "products", as Empedocles (450BC) explained, according to which, to assign one of these reactions to have the religio-mythology based properties of "life" or "death" is but anthropomorphism, as Sherrington (1938) explained; accordingly, "death does not exist", a parallel to the concordant finding that life does not exist. |
“There is neither birth nor death for any mortal, but only a combination and separation of that which was combined, and this is what amongst laymen they call ‘birth’ and ‘death’. Only infants or short-sighted persons imagine any thing is ‘born’ which did not exist before, or that any thing can ‘die’ or parish totally.”— Empedocles (c.450BC), Fragment I21 / DK8 + Fragment I23 / DK11; cited by Baron d’Holbach in The System of Nature (pg. 27); cited by cited by Alfred Lotka (1925) in Elements of Physical Biology (pg. 185, 246)
“When the elements have been ‘mingled’ in the fashion of a man, and come to the light of day, or in the fashion of the race of wild beasts or plants or birds, then men say that these ‘come into being’, and when they are ‘separated’, they call that in common parlance, death .... let not the error prevail over the mind that there is any other source of all the perishable creatures that appear in countless numbers.”— Empedocles (c.450BC), cited by Alfred Lotka (1925) in Elements of Physical Biology (pg. 185) [1]“There is no coming into being of aught that perishes, nor any end for it .... but only mingling, and separation of what has been mingled.”— Empedocles (c.450BC), cited by Alfred Lotka (1925) in Elements of Physical Biology (pg. 246) [1]
“Birth is the aggregation of atoms, death is their disaggregation or destruction of atomic composite, without anything being derived from nothing and nothing going into anything in the process.”— Leucippus (c.460BC), and or the analogous views of Empedocles and Anaxagoras [2]
“Both the scientific and the everyday elbow are one and the same system of electrical charges. It is of no use asking physics and chemistry whether it is alive. They do not understand the word.”— Charles Sherrington (1938), Man on His Nature (pg. 236)
“When physics and chemistry have entered on their description of the perceptible, life disappears from the scene, and consequently death. Both are anthropisms.”— Charles Sherrington (1938), Man on His Nature (pg. 260)
A + B → C | Chemical Reactionbecomes, in some imagined "magical" emergence mechanism, the following:
A + B → C + D | Living Chemical Reaction [??]
There is no “life” or “death” involved in any step of the mechanism. Likewise, when dihydrogen H₂ reacts with oxygen O₂ to form water H₂O:
There is no “life” or “death” involved in any step of the mechanism. Similarly, if methane CH4, a "carbon-based" (or CH-based) species, reacts with oxygen O₂, to form carbon dioxide CO₂ and water H₂O:
There is no “life” or “death” involved in any step of the mechanism. Similarly, scaling this mechanism upwards, skipping a number of years of mechanism development, when male human element Hu, a "carbon-based" (or CH-based) species, reacts with a female human element Hu to form a dihumanide molecule Hu₂ and a new human element Hu:
Hu + Hu → Hu₂ + Hu
There is no “life” or “death” involved in any step of the mechanism. Because, accordingly, of our ingrained anthropisms, we are conditioned to "believe" that the latter reaction involves "life", is some sort of "living chemical reaction", and or originated from a "spark of life" (e.g. warm pond model) or on a heated clay substrate (e.g. clay substrate model), among dozens of other convoluted models (see: life models), whereas the former three reactions involve no "life". Correctly, the latter types of reactions, involving large forms of CH-based species, e.g. CHNOPS+ species, are but reactions that form more complex types of powered-animation (see: animate things). The motion and animation exist in these latter forms, but "life" and "death" do not.
“We do not regard a vacuum, in terms of its vacuity, as something of ‘real existence’, but rather as a lack or absence as shadow is the absence of light or as blindness is the absence of sight, conditions which have no real existence in themselves. Furthermore, as death is the extinction of life, so death is without reality. In the same way a vacuum is the absence of fullness, but in no way does it follow that a lack or absence of this or that thing, which is commonly called a ‘vacuum’, is of real existence.”— Otto Guericke (1663), New Magdeburg Experiments on the Vacuum of Space (pg. 88)