Left: Basic family: mother, father, and daughter (in a pool). Right: Bound state representation of a family: MxFyBc (father Mx, mother Fy, child Bc), connected by human chemical bonds (photon bonds γ). [1] |
“Every family is a combination of human chemicals.”— Thomas Dreier (1948), We Human Chemicals
“It should be obvious that family, not the individual, is the real molecule of society, the key link of the social chain of being. The family [is] the societal germ or ‘molecule’ that Nisbet proclaims.”
“To put the matter metaphorically, only when the family molecule begins to dissolve into individual atoms can the rational reconstruction or resynthesis that we call modernization be undertaken.”
In 2007, American electrochemical engineer Libb Thims began to describe families, chemically, using three points of view: as “bound states” of human molecules; as di-humanide or tri-humanide molecules, etc., depending on geometry and molecule count; or using human molecular orbital theory as overlaps of probability orbitals. [1]
“Families vary in the extent to which they are open systems; relatively closed systems run the risk of entropy or decay and disorganization.”