Left: a depiction of “Goethe love thought experiment”, an 1808 conceived love thought experiment (see: Goethe timeline), conceived in the mind of German polymath Johann Goethe about the paradoxical situation surrounding the nature of love in the scenario of a hero being simultaneously in love with four women; this premise was worked into a draft story called “The Renouncers”, which, with the addition of the solution method of employing Torbern Bergman’s affinity diagram logic to deal with the issue of “choice”, in the following year, ballooned into the physical chemistry based passions novella Elective Affinities. Right: the cover of American romantic period historian Mary Crawford’s 1911 Goethe and His Woman Friends, giving indication to fact that the sheer number of female relationships Goethe’s culled in his reaction existence, makes for a focused subject in itself. [3] |
“Each in her own way is lovable; whichever one he is drawn to in the mood of the moment, she alone is lovable.”
“Why, Claude wonders, should he fall for Mary rather than some other girl who would be equally suitable and equally attractive? Is love just the chance collision of two people who are, as the saying goes, in the right place at the right time—a kind of lucky hit in the dark? ‘Juxtaposition’, within the frame of Amours, fits into two sets of metaphors. The first of these is chemical and has to do with the concept of elective affinities: the idea that elements having inherent tendencies to form combinations and that they will combine and recombine according to these tendencies when placed in solution with each other. Goethe had explored the social and sexual implications of the concept in his novel Die Wahlverwandtschaften (1809), a work that obviously influenced Clough’s reflections on the subject of Amours. [4]. Goethe’s novel is really more of a thought experiment about enlightenment than anything else. In it, a hyperrational couple invite into their home a pair of outsiders, only to discover that the foreign elements bring with them dangerous forces of elective affinity. The four main characters find themselves reshuffling their relations according to these affinities, and the results are devastating.”