In hmolscience, hmolscience (youngest thinkers), as compared to famous publications by age—a listing of hmolscience thinker publications, the products of which tend to be produced into the security of retirement and or tenure years, the 60s or 70s age range—refers to a listing of youngest aged thinkers, independently—meaning they either published on their own accord and or came into the circle of hmolscience discussions, e.g. Hmolpedia threads, Human Chemist 101 (YouTube) forums, or HumanThermodynamics.com posts, etc., on their own accord—to have grappled with hmolscience concepts and their implications, the term “grapple” used in the Bernard DeVoto (1928) “three times" sense of the matter of the matter: [1]

“Pareto’s Trattato di Sociologia Generale [Treatise on General Sociology] is the hardest boiled book I have ever read. Three times, since I passed my puberty, has my mind been made over. Once by a nexus of which Henry Adams was the center, once by a matrix of which Frazer burned brightest, and once by a long study of genetics and evolution. Pareto is doing the job a fourth time, and far more vitally than any others.”

List
The following is the work-in-progress listing of youngest hmolscience thinkers by age:

Age
Person
IQcit
IQact
Quote / Description / Publication










17Benjamin Cresdee
(1994-)

 In 2011, after spending (Ѻ) around 6-12 months on YouTube watching the Human Chemistry 101 channel, in conjunction with messaging communication with Libb Thims, began to assimilate hmolscience theory; the following being a representative reflection comment of his experience:

Quote: “I must say, I started watching your videos over a year ago, and have re-watched many. And they still fascinate me. I’m only 17 and I’m seriously considering doing a degree in chemistry after watching your videos. The only downside is not many people I know can have a conversation about the things you’re talking about. You were right your videos are decades if not a century in front of its time.”
18William Sidis
(1898-1944)		300185In 1916, at the age of 18, sent a letter to Julian Huxley in which he stated: [4]

“How has everything been this summer with you? I myself have been writing that [animate and inanimate] theory of mine regarding the second law of thermodynamics. In a short while, I expect I will be in Cambridge, studying in the Law School. The university opens September 25.”
c.18Christopher Hirata
(1982-)		225190± In 2000, at circa age 18, penned “The Physics of Relationships”, on the topics of a thermochemical approach to relationships, complex equilibria of men and women, human molecular theory, reaction kinetics, neutron scattering, and shell model, among other topics.
18 Inderjit Singh
[User: NikolaTesla]
(1996-)		160
 On 1 May 2014, joined Hmolpedia as user: NikolaTesla, and as of 21 Jun 2014 had 51 thread contributions, 5 page edits, stated that his IQ was 160, that he was drawn to the site because of the genius IQs table, which he said was the best and most accurate he had ever seen in print on online, and seemed to be catching on rather quickly, e.g. in regards to difficult topics such as the defunct theory of life (2009), the Faraday movement query (1859), etc.
c.20Ryan Grannell
(c.1991-)

 In 2011, at circa age 20, started a blog series “Category: Human Chemistry, Bag of Many Things”, wherein he set out, as a detractor, to deride hmolscience as ‘junk science’.
c.23Libb Thims
(c.1975-)

 At circa age 20, began to do the “love thought experiment” in terms of non-physical science methods: physical, mental, and trait matching characteristics; however, after reading David Buss’ The Evolution of Desire (1994), and sometime thereabouts, before or after, when following and or during classes in: physical chemistry and chemical thermodynamics, began to redo or rather re-think the love thought experiment (see: Thims thought experiment) in terms of free energy change (and later free energy differentials) and human chemical reaction theory.
23David Bossens
(1989-)

In 2012, began to post queries, at first anonymously (Ѻ, Ѻ, Ѻ) and later as D.Boss, in Hmolpedia, eventually writing a books on his experience. [3]
25Henry Adams
(1838-1918)
195In 1863, wrote the following to Charles Gaskell: [2]

Quote: “Everything in this universe has its regular waves and tides. Electricity, sound, the wind, and I believe every part of organic nature will be brought someday within this law. The laws which govern animated beings will be ultimately found to be at bottom the same with those which rule inanimate nature, and as I entertain a profound conviction of the littleness of our kind, and of the curious enormity of creation, I am quite ready to receive with pleasure any basis for a systematic conception of it all. I look for regular tides in the affairs of man, and, of course, in our own affairs. In ever progression, somehow or other, the nations move by the same process which has never been explained but is evident in the oceans and the air. On this theory I should expect at about this time, a turn which would carry us backward.”

(add discussion)

Other
In 2011, Singaporean purported to be chemistry prodigy Ainan Cawley, at the age of 12, stated his recently-educated view, as recounted in his father’s overly-imaginative blog article “Seeing the World With Chemical Eyes”, that the process of walking across the road, to a drainage ditch, and with an effortful stretch, stretched his leg across the ditch and stepped up onto a wall, was an “endothermic reaction”, thinking that to go against gravity, i.e. uphill, required energy, or that energy when in, or something along these lines. (Ѻ) This, however, would seem not to be hmolscience proper, but rather only the think of a young person that burning up calories via exercise is endothermic, or something along these lines.

References
1. Stegner, Wallace E. (2001). The Uneasy Chair: A Biography of Bernard DeVoto (Pareto, 26+ pgs; course, pg. 82; derivation, pg. 110; §: Seminar on Pareto, pg. 138-43; three times, pg. 138). University of Nebraska Press.
2. (a) Adams, Henry. (1863). “Letter to Charles Gaskell”, Oct.
(b) Adams, Henry. (1982). The Letters of Henry Adams, Volume 1: 1858-1868 (editor: Jacob Levenson) (pgs. 395-96). Harvard University Press.
(c) Stevenson, Elizabeth. (1997). Henry Adams: a Biography (pg. 69). Transaction Publishers.
(d) Taylor, Matthew A. (2008). Universes Without Selves: Cosmologies of the Non-Human in American Literature (pg. 108), PhD dissertation, Johns Hopkins University. ProQuest, 2009.
3. (a) Bossens, David. (2012). “Reflections: Criticisms of Science” (abs), LuLu.com, Jun 06.
(b) Bossens, David. (2013). Debates of the Hmolpedians. Lulu.
4. Sidis, William J. (1916). “Letter to Julian Huxley”, Aug 28.

TDics icon ns