Images of the 1974-75 Kanawha County textbook controversy, in West Virgina. Top (left): a video still of Alice Moore, the leader of the protests, on camera during testimony. Top (right): one of the 3,600 to 10,000 miners that went on strike over the textbooks. Bottom (left): a street march, showing a sign "God is Not a Myth", in objection to the teaching curriculum change of how children are asked to compare the Bible story of Daniel in the Lion’s Den to Aesop’s fable “Androcles and the Lion?” (Ѻ), suggesting that both were myths. Bottom (right): a Kanawha County woman (Ѻ) protesting against the deemed anti-Christian textbooks, with the sign "Even Hillbillies have Constitutional Rights". |
“All praise is due to Allah that I moved to Boston when I did. If I hadn't, I'd probably still be a brainwashed black Christian.”
“One of the elementary school books had a poem that referenced God, but they used a lowercase g. In another section, they had a plural reference to ‘gods’ capitalized.”
The clipping of Lee Strobel's 20 Oct 1974 Chicago Tribute article on the Kanawha Country textbook uproar; which mentions reverend Marvin Horan, later sentenced to three years on prison for conspiring to blow up two elementary schools over the textbooks. [4] |
Strobel: “Why are you so enraged over the new school textbooks?”Video clips, depicted adjacent, show Moore complaining about Dynamics of Language during testimony. [5]
Businessman: “Listen to what Dynamics of Language tells our kids. To quote: ‘Read the theory of divine origin and the story of the Tower of Babel as told in Genesis. Be prepared to explain one or more ways these stories could be interpreted.’ [tossing a well-worn clipping on the table] The theory of divine origin! The word of god is not a theory. Take god out of creation and what’s left? Evolution? Scientists want to teach our kids that divine origin is just a theory that stupid people believe but that evolution is a scientific fact. Well, it’s not. And that’s at the bottom of this.”
Strobel: “Are you saying Charles Darwin is responsible for this?”
Businessman: “Let me put it this way: If Darwin’s right, we’re just sophisticated monkeys. The Bible is wrong. There is no god. And without god, there’s no right or wrong. We can just make up our morals as we go. The basis for all we believe is destroyed. And that’s why this country is headed to hell in a handbasket. Is Darwin responsible? I’ll say this: people have to choose between science and faith, between evolution and the Bible, between the Ten Commandments and make-‘em-up-as-you-go ethics. We’ve made our choice—and we’re not budging.”
Businessman: [taking a swig of beer] “Have you seen the teacher’s manual?”
Strobel: No.
Businessman: “It says students should compare the Bible story of Daniel in the Lion’s Den to that [slave and the thorn in the lion’s paw] myth
Strobel: “Androcles and the Lion?” (Ѻ) [from Aesop’s fable]
Businessman: “Yeah, that’s the one. [wagging a french fry at Strobel] What does it tell our kids when they’re supposed to compare that to the Bible? That the Bible is just a bunch of fairy tales? That it’s all myth? That you can interpret the Bible any way you darn please, even if it rips the guts out of what it really says?”
Businessman: “We’ve got to put our foot down. I’m not going to let a bunch of eggheads destroy the faith of my children.”
Local businessman turned activist Don Mean’s 2010 War in Kanawha County, recount of the event. [3] |
See main: Moral relativismOne textbook included a story of a child cheating a merchant out of a penny. Students were asked:
“Most people think that cheating is wrong. Do you think there is ever a time when it might be right to? Tell when it is. Tell why you think it is right.”
“We’re trying to get our kids to do the right thing. Then these books come along and say that sometimes the wrong thing is the right thing. We just don’t believe that! The ten commandments are the ten commandments.”
“A few extremists among the churchman who wanted ‘godless’ textbooks removed from the schools became so fanatical they discussed bombing carloads of children whose parents were driving them to school in defiance of the boycott.”— Reporter (1974), article in Charleston Gazette [5]
“They're shooting people because they don't want to see violence in books.”— Student (1974) [6]
“If a parent objects to some particular textbook, they can tell the teacher that their child is not supposed to be involved or to have to use that textbook. What do we do? Does the child hold his hand up and say: ‘I’m sorry Mrs. Smith, my mother doesn’t want me to read that book. I’ve got to leave the room.’ I know what happens to a child like that. I know what happens to students who are the babies in the class, who are too immature to read certain materials: they’re the laughing stock of the schools.”— Alice Moore (1974), interview commentary, following defeat [5]