Dual Nobel Prize Winners
Three of four of the people to win two Nobel Prizes, namely: Marie Curie, Linus Pauling, John Bardeen, and Frederick Sanger, were products of early parental death and genius. Libb Thims, similar educationally to Pauling and Bardeen, is also a product of early parental death. Some of Thims work has been sent to the Nobel Prize committee, albeit in an unofficial manner.

Dual Nobel Prize Winners

Three of four of the people to win two Nobel Prizes, namely: Marie Curie, Linus Pauling, John Bardeen, and Frederick Sanger, were products of early parental death and genius. Libb Thims, similar educationally to Pauling and Bardeen, is also a product of early parental death. Some of Thims work has been sent to the Nobel Prize committee, albeit in an unofficial manner.

In existographies, Libb Thims (Nobel Prize) refers to dialogue and or discussion concerning Libb Thims and the Nobel Prize, which Thims was unofficially nominated for in 2007 (by Georgi Gladyshev) and or the Ig Nobel Prize, the group of which profiled Thims in 2010 (by Martin Gardiner).

Overview
In circa 2003, Libb Thims, during his studies of patterns of genius, e.g. early parental death and genius, and genius studies in general, noticed commonality that three of four people to ever win two Nobel Prizes, namely: Marie Curie, Linus Pauling, John Bardeen, and Frederick Sanger, as shown adjacent, had the commonality that 75 percent, namely: Curie, Pauling, and Bardeen, were the products of early parental death. This, also being a product of early parental death, found this pattern curious? [1] Thims also noticed that this group of dual prize winners had similar educational background to Thims, namely: Linus Pauling (BS chemical engineering) similar to Thims (BS chemical engineering), John Bardeen (BS electrical engineering) similar to Thims (BS electrical engineering), that physics (Curie, PhD) and physical chemistry (Pauling, PhD) were two of Thims favorite subjects, and that Thims at the time was ruminating on completing a PhD in biochemistry (Sanger) and or an MS in particle physics. Sometime herein, Thims conceived, humorously, that he was predispositioned towards winning two Nobel Prizes, and that if he was really going to do things right, he should aim to win three.

In 2007, Russian physical chemist Georgi Gladyshev, who had been working on the thermodynamics of evolution and sociology since the 1970s, after becoming aware of Thims work, e.g. his Human Chemistry (2007), flew out to Chicago, with his wife, and took Thims out to dinner to tell him that he had sent Thims' work into the Nobel Prize committee as a potential, albeit unofficial, nomination.

In 2010, Martin Gardiner, of the Annals of Improbable Research, the group that administers the Ig Nobel Prizes, whose motto is to award people whose: “achievements that make people laugh, then think”, ran a four-part, three-day article on Thims, entitled “I Am Not A Molecule”, subtitled 'Inside the IoHT', discussing topics such as Thims' 2008 book The Human Molecule, the Human Chemistry 101 video lectures on the human molecule, the Institute of Human Thermodynamics, the Journal of Human Thermodynamics, among other topics. Gardiner considers the subject of the chemistry and thermodynamics of human molecules to be an emergent intellectual development.

Others, during this period, such as shown below, began to either suggest that Thims might win a Nobel prize some day and or confuse the fact that Gladyshev sent in a nomination to the Nobel Prize committee with an actual nomination:

“Congratulations, Libb, you've just scored 20 points on the Baez scale for suggesting that you deserve a Nobel Prize [pisstake: Gladyshev (2007) suggested this].”
— Philip Moriarty (2009), “Moriarty-Thims debate (part two)” (Ѻ), post #134-35, Sep 13

“Libb Thims: the great oracle and developer of human thermodynamics—the philosophical revolution of the 21st century. A genius of outstanding stature and originator of many concepts in human chemistry. [His] breathtaking contribution to science needs to be rewarded. Let’s hope one day [he] can add a Nobel Prize to [his] impressive career.”
— Mark Janes (2011), English chemical engineering student turned biotechnologist and human free energy theorist [2]

An official nomination, to note, can only be done by a select number of people from around the world specifically chosen by the Noble Prize committee. Gladyshev is not one of these people. Therefore, accordingly, Thims has never "officially" been nominated, but only nominated unofficially.

Quotes
The following are related quotes:

“Thims’ website [EoHT.info] is [in part] dedicated to the estimations of the IQs of the world’s greatest geniuses, and does have some interesting information, but is riddled with historical inaccuracies. Thims, moreover, is a delusional moron of a man, with far too much spare time, who equates his intellect with that of Goethe and Einstein on almost no basis whatsoever, and who believes he can measure the likes of the IQs of Voltaire, Leibniz or Pascal. He even won an Ig Nobel Prize! (A satirical honour).”
— Dominic Anderton (2015), David Hume + Voltaire political philosopher (Ѻ) [3]

“Your page on Hmolpedia claims you were nominated for a Nobel Prize in 2007. The nomination database does not return any results for the name 'Thims'. Can you provide support for this claim?”
— Dalton Jackson (2016), Reddit dialogue (Ѻ), Sep 21

References
1. Dual-Laureate Similarities (Libb Thims profile) – Institute of Human Thermodynamics.
2. Janes, Mark. (2011). "Libb Thims", Carbon-Entromorphology.com.
3. (a) Thims, Libb. (2007). Human Chemistry (Volume One). Morrisville, NC: LuLu.
(b) Thims, Libb. (2007). Human Chemistry (Volume Two). Morrisville, NC: LuLu.
4. (a) Gardiner, Martin. (2010). “Inside the IoHT: I am not a molecule (parts 1, 2, 3, 4)”, Improbable Research, Jun 04-06.

(b) Martin Gardiner (about) – Improbable.com.
(c) Thims, Libb. (2008). The Human Molecule, (preview) (Google Books). Morrisville, NC: LuLu.
(d) Libb Thims | What’s Hot – Regator.com.