Top: the panbioism view holds that all super human sized entities, such as the earth, milky way, the universe, are alive. Bottom: Two examples of entities, the proton nucleon and hydrogen atom, that one will have to accept as being alive if one adopts the panbioism perspective: the view that everything in the universe, smallest to biggest, is alive. |
“Neither creation nor destruction of life, according to Anaxagoras, was possible, and although, in his opinion, plants, animals, and man all come from the earth slime, nevertheless it was essential that this should be fructified by unchanging and infinitely small seeds (spermata), the ethereal embryos, which were carried into the earth from the air with rain water.”
— Alexander Oparin (1936), The Origin of Life
“The mind is nothing but the result of an organic combination of physical powers. The universe is, as it were, a chemical, magnetical, electrical, etc., laboratory, in which, the material powers (also called vital powers) consummate their unceasing changes and transformations. Where one formation ceases [final state], another begins [initial state]. Even the corpse of man lives; but this is no longer human life, it is only the life of ‘anorganic’ nature [see: inorganic life], to which the human form, after its dissolution, returns, and out of which ‘organic’ nature reproduces itself. There is nothing dead in the world, and dying implies only a retransformation to the material of common life.”— Karl Heinzen (1846), Six Letters to a Pious Man (pg. 14)
“For Nietzsche, everything [organic and inorganic] is alive, everything is active and dynamic in the most fundamental sense, and everything is ultimately constituted out of the primal drive to increase power.”
Top: the panbioism view holds that supramolecular entities, such as hemoglobin and human molecules, are alive.Bottom (left): A 2007 except diagram of American electrochemical engineer Libb Thims's vacillating on the "is the aspartic acid alive? question, which boils down to the deeper question: "is the hydrogen atom alive?" question, which amounts to the the point at which one stops calling molecules as being alive: being that many currently define RNA (ribonucleic acid) as the first form of life; similar to how many in the 1960s were debating about whether or not the virus or virus molecule was alive? [1] |
“Even though—in most physical overviews—atoms would be taken to be precursor components of the human body (and other macroscopic objects), atoms aren't called "proto-humans" or "proto-biotic bodies", etc., or categorized under items like "pan-humanism" or "pan-bioism". Thus, our current tendency to label speculatively global primitive or elemental stages of later brain-grounded consciousness with terms like "panpsychism", "panexperientialism", and proto-versions of those (including proto-consciousness) is probably inhibiting exploration beyond neural activity because of the stigma of "kook territory" that they engender.”
“What if it turned out that everything had a double helix? Pan-bio-ism!”
“The premise of the Quincey's book, which he says are themed on the ideas of Pierre Teilhard, Henri Bergson, and Arthur Young, is that the ‘universe is not dead’, as the materialists would have it, but rather matter is alive (and the universe is alive), and has consciousness, on the model that the photon is the unit of being and becoming (Young's theory). The alternative to this "everything is alive theory", is the "emergence theory" (Gladyshev's view), that life emerged at one point in the evolution timeline from hydrogen to human. Both theories, however, become nonsensical when the one looks into the details of the argument. The only solution, which I have been employing in my writing in the last year, is to stop using the words "life", "living", and "alive", being that they have no scientific basis, and to instead begin using the terms "animated", "reactive", "moving", etc., in the place of the defunct terms.”
A query post by David Bossens about equilibrium, death, free energy, and maximum entropy, after which, in response by Thims (post #20), in dialogue with Jeff Tuhtan, the term "panbioism" began to be employed. |
“Re (Jeff): “So to be technically correct you could just say ‘animate = life’ and everything in the universe is ‘alive’"; to correct you on this, if this is indeed your current stance, i.e. the ‘everything is alive theory’, aka ‘panbioism’, being similar or nearly synonymous with panpsychism or panexperientialism. I would suggest for you to slow your roll on this one. At least from experience, when you first adopt the molecular formula point of view of everything, as I did in 2005 by making the world’s first molecular evolution table, and a later expanded evolution timeline (2009), one of the first natural tendencies is to attempt to extend the concept of ‘alive’ down past the hydrogen atom into the proton and below. You can see in my Human Chemistry chapter five ‘Molecular Evolution’, pages 123-131, up to the comment about ‘spark day’ [see: Ferris Jabr, 2013], that I was still vacillating on this issue. It takes some time to get this loose puzzle out of one’s head to say the least. A good starting point is to ask yourself ‘is the hydrogen atom alive (yes/no)’?”
“Abstract: Life is an inordinately complex unsolved puzzle. Despite significant theoretical progress, experimental anomalies, paradoxes, and enigmas have revealed paradigmatic limitations. Thus, the advancement of scientific understanding requires new models that resolve fundamental problems. Here, I present a theoretical framework that economically fits evidence accumulated from examinations of life. This theory is based upon a straightforward and non-mathematical core model and proposes unique yet empirically consistent explanations for major phenomena including, but not limited to, quantum gravity, phase transitions of water, why living systems are predominantly CHNOPS (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur), homochirality of sugars and amino acids, homeoviscous adaptation, triplet code, and DNA mutations. The theoretical framework unifies the macrocosmic and microcosmic realms, validates predicted laws of nature, and solves the puzzle of the origin and evolution of cellular life in the universe.”
“How life abides by the second law of thermodynamics yet evolutionarily complexifies and maintains its intrinsic order is a fundamental mystery in physics, chemistry, and biology.”
“Essentially, objects — atoms, cells, molecules, chemicals and so on — are packets of energy and matter that are described by gyres – spinning spirals. Gyres are defined by the singularity at one end and the changing shape of the spiral at the other. Everything around us oscillates between excited and ground states as they pivot around the center of these lifelike gyres. Everything isn’t alive, exactly, but gyres have ‘lifelike characteristics’.”
“Everything is alive; everything is interconnected.”— Cicero (55BC), original: Omnia vivunt; omnia inter se conexa; possibly a misattribution (2004) done via "motto" of online Grey Wizard School (Ѻ); though, to note, he may have had similar (Ѻ) views, as found in his De Natura Deorum