A depiction of relativity as the curving of spacetime around mass, according to American physicist John Wheeler. [3] |
“Such a principle [relativity] resulted from a paradox upon which I had already hit at the age of sixteen: If I pursue a beam of light with a velocity c (velocity of light in a vacuum), I should observe such a beam of light … at rest. However, there seems to be no such thing, whether on the basis of experience or according to Maxwell’s equations.”In circa 1903-05, Einstein, while working at the Swiss patent office, as a third-class examiner, received a proposed invention of a device to synchronize clocks, e.g. by sending light or a radio wave between, say, Bern, Basel, or Zurich, thereby insuring that each strike an hour at the exact same moment. On this question, Einstein imagined a person standing half way between two distant clocks, each send out a signal at the same time, say seven, will say the clock strikes are simultaneous; but if someone is moving past the person—say on a train—really fast toward one of the clocks, that person will receive the signal from that clock first. From this thought experiment, Einstein deduced that since all motion is relative, neither observer was right or wrong: the speed of light is constant, but what is “simultaneous” is relative, which means time is relative, depending on one’s motion. (Ѻ)(Ѻ)
See main: Social relativity theoryIn the 1940s, American physical historian Morris Zucker attempted to outline a relativity like field theory of history; the result, however, amounted to a lot of talk, but without much meat.
“An hour sitting with a pretty girl on a park bench passes like a minute, but a minute sitting on a hot stove seems like an hour.”— Albert Einstein (c.1925), “explanation of relativity given to his secretary for use when answering inquiries”; cited by Jamie Sayen (1985) in Einstein in America (Ѻ)
“Space tells matter how to move and matter tells space how to curve.”References— John Wheeler (1998), Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam (Ѻ)“If we are to make a family tree analogy of the genesis of the mathematical aspect of the theory of relativity: the great grandfather would be Leibnitz; the grandfather would be Gauss; the father would be Riemann, and the son would be Einstein.”— Monydit Malieth (2013), The Future Affects the Past [5]