See main: Gas lawsIn 1647, German engineer Otto Guericke invented a vacuum pump to disprove Greek philosopher Parmenides' circa 485 BC hypothesis that “nature abhors a vacuum”, and or the variant of this logic in Rene Descartes cosmology. Guericke’s vacuum pump experimentation was first described in the 1657 book Mechanical Hydraulic Pneumatics by German scientist Gaspar Schott, a correspondent of Guericke.
“Boyle first learned of these [1644 to 1648] [Florence and Paris] accomplishments in experimental pneumatics, by Torricelli, Pascal, and Roberval, through the correspondence of Charles Cavendish, Theodore Haak, and Samuel Hartlib.”— Steven Shapin (1985), Leviathan and the Air Pump (pg. 83)
A reconstructive photo (Greer, 2007) of Robert Hooke, left, and Robert Boyle, right, doing pressure and volume experiments with their pneumatical engine, which is a glass bulb, aka “receiver” (or vacuum bulb), attached to a vacuum pump (aka air pump). [12] |
“You speak still of the ‘German vacuum’ as of no ordinary beauty; but the poet says, Uritque videndo fæmina.”
— Samuel Hartlib (1658), “Letter to Robert Boyle”, Jan 7 [9]
“I did not set about the construction of an air pump until I had heard of Guericke’s ‘way of emptying glass vessels, by sucking out the air at the mouth of the vessel’.”— Robert Boyle (1659), “Letter to nephew, Lord Dungarvan” [14]
“You may be pleased to remember, that a while before our separation in England, I told you of a ‘book’ [Mechanics of Gas Hydraulics, 1657], that I had heard of, but not perused, published by the industrious Jesuit Schottus; wherein, it was said, he related how that ingenious gentleman, Otto Guericke, consul of Magdeburg, had lately practiced in Germany a way of emptying glass vessels, by sucking, out the air at the mouth of the vessel, plunged under water. And you may also perhaps remember, that I expressed myself much delighted with this experiment, since thereby the great force of the external air, either ruining in at the opened orifice of the emptied vessel, or violently forcing up the water into it, was rendered more obvious and conspicuous than in any experiment that I had formerly seen. And though it may appear by some of those writings I sometimes showed you, that I had been solicitous to try things upon the same ground; yet in regard this gentleman was beforehand with me in producing such considerable effects by means of the exsuction of air, I think myself obliged to acknowledge the assistance and encouragement the report of his performances hath afforded me.”— Robert Boyle (1659), “Letter to nephew, Lord Dungarvan” (Ѻ), Dec 20
“I am now prosecuting some things with an engine I formerly writ to you about.”— Robert Boyle (1659), “Letter to Samuel Hartlib”, Nov [10]
Experiment | Description | Notes | ||
------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ | |||
1. | He sucked out the air by several "exsuctions" until he got to the point that if he let the handle go, the piston would rise up on its own, spinning the handle, or something to this effect (pgs. 7-8). | |||
2. | Talked about the difficulty of raising a cap or stopper (stopple) from the evacuated receiver. | Discussed by Henry More in his Anecdote Against Atheism. [10] | ||
3. | ||||
4. | Half full lamb's bladder | He puts a lamb's bladder, with half of its full capacity of air, ties it off, puts it in the receiver, and begins to do several exsuctions, and watches the bladder expand. | Boyle cites Gilles Roberval, and his carp's bladder experiment, as being the originator of this. | |
5. | Does another variation of the bladder experiment, where he breaks the bladder. | |||
6. | Did some type of bladder tied to a small tube, either with air, with air and water, or with water, and tested to see expansion. | “It hath seemed almost incredible, which is related by the industrious Mersennus (Marin Mersenne), that air, by the violence of heat, though as great as our vessels can support without suction, can be made so dilated as to take up seventy times as much room as before.” — Robert Boyle (1660), New Experiments (pg. 15) | ||
7. | Made some kind of glass blown bubble figure which the put into the receiver. | |||
8. | Did something with the glass apparatus of figure 7. | |||
9. | ||||
10. | Did various candle's lit inside the vacuum, seeing how long they could make the flame last, observing the smoke, etc. | |||
11. | Used the coiled wire (figure 10) and put burning coals in it. | |||
12. | Did some type of experiment with a soldier's lit match in the receiver. | |||
13. | Put a match and a sealed bladder into the receiver to test to see if smoke would replenish the receiver. | |||
14. | Fired the trigger of a pistol against gunpowder to test for sparks. | |||
15. | Put some combustible material in the receiver and tried to light it on fire with a magnifying glass. | |||
16. | Put an iron needle into the receiver and found that a loadstone (magnet) attracted the needle. | |||
17. | Void-in-void | A Torricellian apparatus was put into the receiver and then evacuated to see if the tube level would fall to the level in the basin; Boyle said this was "the principle fruit I promised myself from our engine". [10] The could not, however, get the mercury down to the basin level, the level remaining a few inches above. | Done earlier by the French school. Note the second generation Boyle pump did get the level all the way down. | |
18. | Put some mercury in a long tube, with some air (or something) and put in his bedroom window next to a weather glass, and observed the two for several weeks; talked a lot about it. | |||
19. | Repeated the void-in-void experiment, but with water. | Then noted that Blaise Pascal had tried this earlier. | ||
20. | Did some type of water in an egg-shaped vessel; and talked about some type of syringe experiment they did a few years back. | Talked about the experimental philosophy of a Mr. Wilkins. | ||
21. | Put an oiled bladder into a tube of water and put it into the receiver, to test for atmospheric pressure on water, or something. | |||
22. | Did some type of modified water experiment to try to test to see what the bubbles were. | |||
23. | Did something similar to experiment #22, but with distilled rainwater and used vessels called "philosophical eggs" as the chemists call them. | |||
24. | Did some experiments with other liquids, such as salad oil, wine, etc. | |||
25. | Did some experiment with mercury and water, and something floating, to test the bubbles. | |||
26. | Pendulum experiment | Put a pendulum inside receiver and put one outside receiver, set them swinging, and tested to see if there was a difference. | ||
27. | Sound in vacuum | Did a variant of Kircher's bell in vacuum experiment with a watch. | Cited Athanasius Kircher as originating the bell test in a vacuum experiment. | |
28. | Did some kind of water in glass egg experiment. | |||
29. | Used some kind of metal like liquid, that smoked or something, to test how meteors might move in space, or something. | |||
30. | Let smoke settle into the receiver, then turned and shoke the receiver to see what would happen, or something along these lines. | |||
31. | Two flat marble discs | This was the separation of two plane surfaces experiment. [10] | This dates back to Lucretius who used it to prove the existence of the vacuum. | |
32. | Weight-raising experiment | Disconnected the evacuated receiver, and used a special tapered valve (figure 9) with attached scale to see how much weight the receiver could raise, testing up to 10 pounds, by throwing on ounce pieces onto the scale until the vacuum broke. | A variant, supposedly, of #2. Boyle, here, in his annotations, digressed on anti-teleology in nature, or something along these lines. [10] | |
33. | Weight-raising experiment | Did a variant of #32, where (pg. 46) they attached 14 to 28 pounds of weight to the teeth of the piston, to be raise or lowered; talked a good deal about this experiment. | “More appealed to Boyle’s experiments #32 and #33 in which large weights were lifted by the sucker [piston] reascending into the cylinder. More claimed that these trials showed the limited applicability of any mechanical law of gravity, and that there ‘is a principle transcending the nature and power of matter that does umpire and rule all.” — Steven Shapin (1985), Leviathan and the Air Pump (pg. 212) | |
34. | Did some type of Archimedes buoyancy of two different objects in water. | |||
35. | Did some type of siphon experiment. | |||
36. | Attempted to weight air, with some kind of glass bubble, a scale, balanced against a piece of lead; talked for awhile about this. | Cited Galileo. | ||
37. | Did some tests to figure out the possibility that they saw some strange flashes of light in the vacuum when they turned the key, to let air in or out or something. | |||
38. | Tested to see how fast snow and salt would melt in a vacuum. | |||
39. | Did something with air and water using figure 14. | |||
40. | Put a fly, bee (and a bee with a flower), and a butterfly into the vacuum. | |||
41. | Tested classical theories about "respiration" in a vacuum, first by putting lark and a mouse in the receiver, he the tried to find a fish to put in, but put in an ell instead. | |||
42. | Tested corrosive liquids on the dissolving of bodies. | |||
43. | Did some experiment where they caused water to be boiled. |
A depiction of Boyle’s "bell a vacuum" test (1669). [15] |
“What that pressure should be according to the [Power] hypothesis, that supposes the pressures and expansions to be in reciprocal proportion.”— Robert Boyle (1662), New Experiments (§A5, point E, pg. 101); based on Henry Power's hypothesis
Boyle's 1670 freezing a "bird in a vacuum" experiment, done to disprove Thomas Hobbes' wind theory of cold, according to which cold and freezing was the result "frigorific particles". |
“FREEZING, in philosophy, the same with congelation. Philosophers are by no means agreed as to the cause of this phenomenon. The Cartesians account for it by the recess or going out of the ethereal matter from the pores of the water. The ‘corpuscularians’, on the other hand, attribute it to the ingress of frigorific particles, as they call them: Hobbes asserts, that these particles are nothing else but common air, which entangling itself with the particles of water, prevents their motion. Others will have a kind of nitrous salt to be the cause of congelation, by insinuating itself between the particles of water, and fixing them together, like nails: and indeed it seems probable that cold and freezing do arise from some substance of a saline nature, floating in the air; since all salts, and particularly nitrous ones, when mixed with ice and snow, greatly increase their cold and even bulk.”
“If men would more carefully distinguish those things that they know from those that they ignore or do but think, and then explicate clearly the things they conceive they understand, acknowledge ingenuously what it is they ignore, and profess so candidly their doubts, that the industry of intelligent persons might be set on work to make further enquiries, and the easiness of less discerning men might not be imposed on.”
Water is one of the few exceptions to Boerhaave’s law type behavior; specifically, when liquid water is cooled, it contracts [V↓] like one would expect until a temperature of approximately 4 degrees Celsius is reached, after which it expands [V↑] slightly until it reaches the freezing point (0°C), and then, when it freezes, it expands by approximately 9%. In c.1664, Boyle, in his investigations of the power of the cold, found that it took 72 pounds of weight to keep the cork from popping out when water froze. |
See also: Absolute zeroIn 1665, Boyle published his New Experiments and Observations Touching Cold, in which he experimentally disproved a number of ancient myths about cold, while also revealing a number of new experimental facts. [5] In one experiment, in measuring the work of the power of cold, Boyle discovered that a weight of 72 pounds was required to prevent expanding ice from pushing out a cork. [6]
“To seem to ‘know all things’ (see: last person to know everything) certainly, and to speak positively of them, is a trick of bold and young fellows; whereas those, that are indeed intelligent and considerate, are wont to employ more wary and diffident expressions as he speaks.”— Aristotle (c.350), Publication; cited by Robert Boyle (1662) in New Experiments Physico-Mechanical on the Spring of the Air (pg. 2); in: Collected Works, Volume One (Ѻ)
“Boyle’s hypothesis of the spring of the air is absurd, ‘unless perhaps we concede what is not to be conceded, that something can be moved by itself. For you suppose that the air particle, which certainly stays still when pressed, is moved to its own restitution, assigning no cause for such a motion, except that particle itself’.”— Thomas Hobbes (1661), Dialogus Physicus (pgs. 247-49); cited by Steven Shapin (1985) in Leviathan and the Air Pump (pg. 141)
“Your main achievement was the expulsion of the ‘devil of substantial forms, which as stopped the progress of true philosophy, and made the best of scholars not more knowing as to the nature of particular bodies, then the meanest ploughman.”— Henry Oldenburg (1666), “Told to Boyle”; cited by Steven Shapin (1985) in Leviathan and the Air Pump (pg. 219)
“Boyle improved on the pneumatic engine invented by Otto Guericke, and was thereby enabled to make several new and curious experiments on the air, as well as on other bodies: his chemistry is much admired by those who are acquainted with that art: his hydrostatics contain a greater mixture of reasoning and invention with experiment than any other of his works; but his reasoning is still remote from that boldness and temerity which had led astray so many philosophers.”— David Hume (1836), The History of England, Volume Two (pg. 653)
“There is a ‘spring’ or elastic power in the air we live in. By which ‘έλατηρ’ or ‘spring of the air’, that which I mean is this: that our air either consists of, or at least, abounds with, parts of such a nature, that in the case they be being or compressed by the weight of the incumbent part of the atmosphere, or by any other, body, the do endeavour, as much as in them lieth, to free themselves from that pressure, by bearing against the contiguous bodies that keep them bent; and, as soon as those bodies are removed, or reduced to give them way, by presently unbending and stretching out themselves, either quite, or so far forth as the contiguous bodies that resist them will permit, and thereby expanding the whole parcel of air, these elastical bodies compose.”
— Robert Boyle (1659), ‘Letter to nephew, Lord Dungarvan’ (pg. 8), Dec 20
“And when with excellent microscopes I discern in otherwise invisible objects the inimitable subtlety of nature’s curious workmanship; and when, in a word, by the help of anatomical knives, and the light of chemical furnaces, I study the ‘book of nature’, and consult the glosses of Aristotle, Epicurus, Paracelsus, Harvey, Helmont, and other learned expositors of that instructive volume; I find myself oftentimes reduced to exclaim with the psalmist, how manifold are thy works, O Lord? In wisdom hast thou made them all.”— Robert Boyle (1659), Some Motives and Incentives to the Love of God (pgs. 59-60) (Ѻ)
“Epicurus supposes not only all mixt bodies, but all others to be produced by the various and casual occursions of atoms, moving themselves to and fro by an internal principle in the immense or rather infinite vacuum.”— Robert Boyle (1861), The Skeptical Chemist (Ѻ)
“Heat seems principally to consist in that mechanical property of matter we call motion.”— Robert Boyle (c.1660), Publication; cited by Donald Cardwell (1971) in From Watt to Clausius (pg. 4)
“The information of sense assisted and highlighted by ‘instruments’ are usually preferable to those of sense alone.”— Robert Boyle (c.1675), “Propositions on Sense, Reason, and Authority” (Ѻ) [10]
A image Robert Boyle, from the front piece of the 1774 The Works of the Honorable Robert Boyle, Volume One, which shows a “bird in a vacuum”, a repercussion of his dispute with Thomas Hobbes, which is captioned with the Latin phrase “Ex rerum Causis Supremam noscere Causam”, which translates as “to known the supreme cause, from the causes of things”. [13] Next to the vacuum pump are a two branch mercury barometer, a double capillary manometer. At left is a furnace with an alembic, for experimenting with fire. |