In hmolscience, Francisco Ayala (1934-) is a Spanish-born American evolutionary geneticist and philosopher noted for his 1983 “Biology and Physics: Reflections and Reductionism”, in which, firstly he presents a short overview of the so-called recent reductionist anti-reductionist debate, citing Rene Descartes, in the pro side, and Aristotle, Henri Bergson, Hans Driesch, on the con side, then secondly, siding in an unmentioned manner with his covert religious faith, Christianity, he attempts to argue that reduction of biology to the physicochemical sciences is impossible, his concluding argument being that biology has teleological properties, whereas chemistry and physics do not.
Problem of reductionism
Ayala defines what he refers to as the “problem of reductionism” as follows: [1]
“The issue here is whether or not physicochemical entities and processes underlie all living phenomena. Are organisms constituted of the same components as those making up inorganic matter? Or, is it the case that organism consist of other entities besides molecules and atoms? Other questions related to the previous ones are the following: Are organisms nothing else than aggregations of atoms and molecules? Do organisms exhibit properties other than those of their constituent atoms and molecules?”
(add discussion)
Ayala summarizes the reductionist anti-reductionist debate as follows:
“In the ontological or constitutive domain, the reductionist-antireductionist controversy in its extreme form resolves into the mechanism versus vitalism issue. The mechanist position is that organism are ultimately made up of the same atoms that make up inorganic matter, and of nothing else. Vitalists argue that organism are made up not only of material components (atoms, molecules, and aggregations of them) but also of some nonmaterial entity, various called by different authors, entelechy, vital force, elan vital, radial energy and the like.”
(add discussion)
Ayala, in his attempt to criticize what he refers to as the “nothing but” fallacy, compares an, similar to the rock vs human comparison, an organism to a steam engine to an electronic computer as follows:
“Organisms consist exhaustively of atoms and molecules. A steam engine may consist only of iron and other materials, but it is something else than iron and other components. Similarly, an electronic computer is not only a pile of semiconductors, wires, plastic, and other materials. Organisms are made up of atoms and molecules, but they are highly complex patterns, and patterns of patters, of these atoms and molecules.”
(add discussion)
Next, in a uncited reference to the John Mill table salt emergent properties argument, first states the following:
“Consider the following question: are the properties of common salt, sodium chloride, simply the properties of sodium and chlorine when they are associated according to the formula NaCl? If among the properties of sodium and chlorine we include their association into table salt and the properties of the latter, the answer is ‘yes’.”
Then he makes the following backwards nearly inane statement:
“Among the properties of hydrogen we do not usually include the properties of water, of ethyl alcohol, or proteins, and of human beings. Nor do we include among the properties of iron those of the steam engine.”
The gist of which being that each “atomic aggregation”, as he refers to things bigger than typical molecule, has distinct “properties” not connected in any way to the elements that make up each aggregate, which, again, is but a descent into idiocy-ville. He continues, likewise:
“Can the properties of benzene be predicted from knowledge about oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon? Or, at a higher level of complexity, can the behavior of a cheetah chasing a deer be predicted from the knowledge about the atoms and molecules making up these animals?”
(add discussion)
Religion
In 1960, Ayala was ordained as a Dominican priest, but left the priesthood that same year. Ayala identifies as a Christian, tending not to discuss his religious views, but is of the view that “science is compatible with religious faith in a personal, omnipotent and benevolent God.” He is a critic of creationism, intelligent design, Christian apologists, and US restrictions on federal funding of stem cell research. In 2009, he debated Christian apologists William Craig. In 2010, Ayala won the Templeton Prize, of $1.5 million, for his vicarious efforts at attempts to reconcile religion and science. (Ѻ)
References
1. Ayala, Francisco J. (1983). “Biology and Physics: Reflections and Reductionism”; in: Old and New Questions in Physics, Cosmology, Philosophy, and Theoretical Biology: Essays in Honor of Wolfgang Yourgrau (editor: Alwyn Merwe) (§A1:525-34). Plenum Press.
2. Lawton, Graham. (2010). “Templeton Prizewinner: We Need Science Plus Morality” (Ѻ), New Scientist, Apr 02.
Further reading
● Ayala, Francisco J. (2010). Am I a Monkey?: Six Big Questions about Evolution. JHU Press.
External links
● Francisco J. Ayala – Wikipedia.