A diagram shown the gist of recension theory (religion morph), originated by Edouard Naville (1886) and Wallis Budge (1899), and or redaction theory (religion syncretism), originated by Gary Greenberg (2000), related to the evolution or change of the contiguous core religion belief model, through empires: Egyptian, Sumerian, Hebrew, Greek, Roman, English, and American, over the last 5,000+ years, all generally rooted in the ancient pre-dynastic sun god Ra, and derivatives or morphs derived therefrom. |
“Each of these three scholarly compilations — which Budge calls ‘recensions’ — are based on groups of texts that were created one after the other during the three phases of ancient Egyptian history, the three 'kingdoms', when the state was centralized and monuments of stone were made. Thus, the so-called ‘Pyramid Texts’ that contain the oldest known religious literature are dated to the Old Kingdom, which began about 3000 BC and lasted for eight centuries. (More precisely the first known examples of the Pyramid Texts, and a near-perfectly preserved corpus in their own right, were engraved c. 2257-2237 BC on the interior chambers and corridors of the Pyramid of Unas.)
The second compilation, dubbed the ‘Coffin Texts’, is dated to the so-called Middle Kingdom, which began about 2150 BC and lasted for 400 years.
The third compilation, the Book of the Dead, is dated to the five-century-long New Kingdom, which began about 1550 BC, though a few chapters are known that are half a century older. Many other religious texts, some of them elaborate and integrated compositions, also appear to have been composed during that period of time. Extensive collections of chapters that appear in the Book of the Dead also continued to be used in burials throughout the Late Period (from around 700 BC) and down into Ptolemaic and Roman times, just as did some of the chapters — sometimes known as 'spells' — from the Pyramid Texts and the Coffin Texts until, eventually, the pagan faith was banned by order of the Christian Roman emperors.”
The city of Heliopolis, aka "city of the sun", located in nome #13 of Lower Egypt, the location of the Heliopolis recension (aka Heliopolis creation myth), originating in 3500 to 3150BC, the first and most dominate Egyptian religio-mythology belief system. |
“Ra was probably the oldest of the gods worshiped in Egypt, and his name belongs to such a remote period that its meaning is unknown.”
“There were three recensions or versions of the Book of the Dead—the Heliopolitan, the Theban, and the Saite. The Heliopolitan recension was edited by the priests of the College of Anu, or On, known to the Greeks as Heliopolis, and was based upon texts not now recoverable. The Pyramids of Unas, Teta, and Pepi contain the original texts of this recension, which represent the theological system introduced by the priests of Ra. The essentials of the primitive Egyptian religion are, however, retained, the only modification in them being the introduction of the solar doctrine of Ra. In later times the priesthood of Ra were forced to acknowledge the supremacy of Osiris, and this theological defeat is visible in the more modern texts. Between the Sixth and Eleventh Dynasties the priests of On edited a number of fresh chapters from time to time.”In 1990, Lewis Spence stated that the Heliopolis priests, in their recension, edited a number of fresh chapters during the 6th and 11th dynasties (2345-1991BC).
“Egypt’s all-embracing framework of myths encompassed at least three accounts of creation. They were all interconnected, but each centered on a particular creator deity or group of deities: the nine gods of Heliopolis, the eight gods of Hermopolis and Ptah, and the god of Memphis, Egypt’s traditional capital. All were credited with creating the universe and their priests all claimed that their temple stood on the very site where creation had begun.”
The city of Hermopolis, located in nome #15 of Upper Egypt, the cited of the second main religious recension of Egyptian theology. |
See main: Hermopolis theology (Hermopolis recension)In 1893, Gaston Maspero asserted his view that the god company of Hermopolis was constructed after the model of the god company of Heliopolis. [12]
“Four different versions of the creation of the world from the benben were developed in Hermopolis: a great egg was laid on the benben by a cosmic goose (containing Re as sun and light who then created the world); an ibis (Thoth) laid the cosmic egg; a lotus stemming from the waters of the Sea of Two Knives in Hermopolis opened and gave birth to the solar child Re; a scarab, the rising sun and the eye of Re, was inside the lotus and was transformed into a crying boy whose tears became mankind.”
This seems to be the root of the later Hinduism recension of creation, such as shown above right (Ѻ), where the snake Ananta-Shesha (Egyptian: Apep) holds the ‘cosmic egg’ out of which the sun (or Ra) is born (or the god Brahma, as the Hindu rewrite tells things).
“Extrapolating from a few Pyramid Texts (Utterance 301 which refers to Nun, Naunet, Amun and Amaunet together), the reference to Hermopolis as the "Unu (Heliopolis) of the south" (Utterance 219) and references to "chaos gods" (Utterances 558, 406), the Hermopolitan Ogdoad appears to have been Egypt's second oldest grouping of divinities. However, its theology and creation myth are mainly known from inscriptions in the surviving Theban Karnak Temple (after c. 1550 BC) as there are no surviving remains of the Hermopolis Temple.”
The city of Memphis, located in nome #2 of Lower Egypt, where the great pyramids of Giza are located, the location of the third major religious recension in Egypt. |
See main: Memphis theology (Memphis recension)In 2003, Canadian-born French Egyptologist Simson Najovits cogently argued, seemingly, that the Memphis theogony was third in historical development:
“It can be supposed that the inclusion of gods from the Heliopolis and Hermopolis Enneads in the Memphis Ennead could have had strictly theological reasons for amalgamating the gods, but it could have also been an attempt to avoid irritating the powerful clergies of Heliopolis and Hermopolis. Moreover, the key constitutive elements in Memphite theology — creation by the head mind and the tongue/word — could have been a radicalization of the Heliopolitan concept that Atum was self-created with the assistance of god Sia, the personification of perception, and the god Hu, the personification of creative utterance. At the same time, Ptah's existence before Atum as much as it can be seen as a theological concept of divine pre-existence, also can easily be interpreted as a sign that the Memphite Temple sought to dominate the older Heliopolitan Temple. Despite claims that the Memphite Ennead and theology were the oldest in Egypt, it seems that the inclusion of gods from Heliopolis and Hermopolis and the development of Heliopolitan theological concepts would logically make it posterior to these latter enneads.”Religio-mythology scholar Gary Greenberg (2000), alternatively, seems to loosely situate the Memphis recension before the Hermopolis recension, wherein an adoption and modification of the Heliopolis model occurred, such that the new chief god Ptah summoned forth Atum from the Nun via spoken word. [5]
The city of Thebes, nome #4 of Upper Egypt, the cite of Theban recension, the fourth major religious morph in Egyptian dynasty religion models. |
“The Theban recension was much in vogue from the Eighteenth to the Twenty-second Dynasties, and was usually written upon papyri and painted upon coffins in hieroglyphs. Each chapter was preserved distinct from the others, but appears to have had no distinct place in the entire collection.”
“The Saite recension was definitely arranged at some date prior to the Twenty-sixth Dynasty, and is written upon coffins and papyri, and also in hieratic and demotic script. It continued to be employed to the end of the Ptolemaic period.”
See main: Judaic recensionIn 2000, Gary Greenberg, in his 101 Myth of the Bible (pg. 7), described what he referred to as "Hebrew redaction", in short, as follows:
“The Hebrew redactors used Egyptian myths to make the biblical stories; which, from time to time, had Babylonian myths grafted onto earlier texts or replaced portions of the original stories.”
Source Date God Roots Discussion ------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ A source 1300BC Aten [see: Aten’s finger] AR source 1250BC Amun; Ra J source 1000BC YHWY; Jahweh [Yahweh] Heliopolis recension roots [4] E source 922BC El; Elohim El god based roots P source 586BC Theban recension roots [4] D source 650BC Editor 500BC
The city of Alexandria, located in nome #3 of Lower Egypt, home to the famous Library of Alexandria, the city of the so-called Alexandrian redaction of Egyptian religion, which subsumed Greek mythology into the new redaction. |
See main: Alexandrian recensionIn 332BC, when Alexander the Great conquered Egypt, therein establishing the so-called Macedonian dynasty (332-305BC), during which time he is said to have commented on how he "recognized his own religion", i.e. Greek theology (Greek mythology), in the Egyptian religion (Egyptian mythology). Sometime herein, as comparative religio-mythology indicates, there was, supposedly, some type of Alexandrian redaction, wherein the powerful priests of this period merged the Saite recension, Hebrew redaction, and Greek recension into a new version of the Old Testament.
“In the Ptolemaic period, in an address to the deceased Kerasher we read "Thy face shineth before Ra, thy soul liveth before Amen, and thy body is renewed before Osiris." And again it is said, " Amen is nigh unto thee to make thee to live again. . . . Amen cometh to thee having the breath of life, and he causeth thee to draw thy breath within thy funeral house.”
The above four books: Dorothy Murdock’s The Christ Conspiracy (1999), Timothy Freke’s The Jesus Mysteries (1999), Joseph Atwill’s Caesar’s Messiah (2006), and Kenneth Humphreys’ Jesus Never Existed (2005), the four main books behind Atwill’s 2012 documentary film on the so-called “Flavian Jesus hypothesis”, aka the “first Roman redaction”, dig around in the muddle of the invention of Jesus from the religious milieu brewing at the time. |
See main: Roman recensionIn the Roman period, there seems to have been first a Roman redaction (69-96AD), during which time the then-prevalent recensions were morphed into a crude Christ-centric theology, based on Osiris myth, which was followed by a second Roman recension, culminating in the Nicene council (325AD)
“These various recensions of these wonderful compositions—of the collection of religious texts generally known by the name Book of the Dead—cover a period of more than five-thousand years.”— Wallis Budge (1899), Egyptian Religion (pg. ix)
“No one can make the search and discover these numberless resemblances without forming the conviction that the Bible writings are ‘rescripts’, often … corrupted, of ancient wisdom literature.”— Alvin Kuhn (1944), Who is the King of Glory? (pg. 191); cited by Tom Harpur (2004) in The Pagan Christ (pg. 30) [6]